Wow. There are a lot of speakers here, and they aren’t all listed in the program….and there’s no way I’ll get them all straight. I’ll see what I can do.
Gil Elbaz, founder/CEO of Factual. They simplify access to clean, reliable data for publishers. Structure and clean data.
Danny Sullivan, Searchengineland
Carla Thompson, Guidewire Group. Search and semantic analyst.
Dag Kittlaus, Siri
Barak Berkowitz, has been at Wolfram Alpha for 10 days.
Nova Spivack, founder of Twine, now at LiveMatrix.
Barney Pell, Microsoft Bing team.
Haha, first real question is, what does semantics mean? We’re going to discuss the semantics of semantics.
Someone [Pell, I think] says, it’s about meaning, figuring out which words match with other words. Also about the abstractions that tie words together. It’s a middle layer that connects the underlying layer to the higher intent.
So Google and Bing are already semantic search engines? Yes.
Thompson says, no that doesn’t clear it up. You lost the consumer after the word abstraction. I think we should get rid of the term.
Pell: I think it’s not a consumer term. It’s a technology term.
Kittlaus says, I’ve been in the Valley less than 3 years and I’m amazed at how little creativity is there in the search field. People argue about who has the biggest database and not about how to solve user’s problems.
Panel is arguing about whether or not today’s search results are adequate or should be replaced with something yet-to-be-conceived. Total geek amusement is all you can say about this.
Good point: Panelist says we have a scalability issue. There’s so much accessible data today, that a solution that could handle a million pieces of data isn’t the best solution for a trillion pieces of data.
Right now, search is good at answering single question. When you need to handle a complex task, you may have to make several searches. Need to better understand the user to better handle complexity.
Spivack: OK are we all just debating Google’s next feature? Or is there room for others?
Pell contends that many search engines [albeit not Google and Bing] are already working together.
Some discussion about the importance/desirability of including social and context info in search results — no discussion of privacy. All about how much better it will make search results.
Spivack comments on WA using expert curation, instead of community curation. Would love to hear more discussion on that point.
Now discussion on how does the engine know if they’ve answered you. And point made that many searches are refined over time…you search for info on getting a mortgage, you ask different things over time, and two months later you buy a house. At what point was your question “answered”?
The backchannel on this panel is pretty negative. I think it’s because there are too many people on the panel. And perhaps could have used a little more planning.